|For the waywardness of the simple will kill them, and the complacency of fools will destroy them - Proverbs 1:32|
E-mail Me |About Me |Home Page |Comment Rules |Ref Desk
Daily Notes :I Moved to MT.
In fact this page will automatically send you to my new page in 4 minutes. Or go there now...Radio Brian Scott
Interesting side note; I’m not sure when this happened, but the argument used to be that there was no way of telling just what was inside the womb. It (the living human baby) was considered by many in the pro-murder community, as being a glob of tissue. In fact, that is what they would tell their pre-abortive patients to help sell the idea. I’m not hearing that argument any longer. Now the argument is: that although this is human life, the murder of the child is necessary either for the health of the mother; over-population reasons; or increases in unwanted children. Give me a break.
Thankfully this decision will be appealed to the Supreme Court and most likely over ruled. The unfortunate part about all this, is that there will be partial birth abortions provided for individuals regardless of what the law states. Why? Because it is nearly impossible to regulate and enforce such laws. Are they going to have law enforcement present for every abortion ever performed from now on? It is highly doubtful. I believe the pro-death doctors are counting on that.
This link proves my point. Warren M. Hern, who wrote the article, recalls a conversation he had with a concerned patient;
posted by: Brian Scott